Thoughts from the Chair: Fall 2024

As I sit here today, between the election and the start of Greenbuild, I suppose what’s expected of me is to seek a forward looking tone, but I don’t feel optimistic. I could say that I’m more motivated than ever to push for a safe, just building industry, but all I really feel is exhaustion. “We’re going to continue the fight” feels forced and hollow.

Yet, the fundamental objective remains that Architecture should support the wellbeing of all people, and I simply do not believe that for some humans to thrive, others must suffer. I realize, perhaps more strongly in the last few days, that this is not a universally held worldview. So be it. Our efforts have always focused on the “coalition of the willing,” and despite everything this continues to grow.

We’ve laid a foundation for understanding building products that cannot be undone. We can’t unsee what we’ve seen. Our goal has never been to force people to choose certain products through political means but to enlighten them towards better choices with the compilation and disclosure of reliable and actionable data.

The thousands of manufacturers that have already committed countless resources to understanding and improving their products have no reason to reverse course.

So let’s simply continue what we’ve been doing. We’ve amassed this tremendous amount of data about building products. New tools are easing the connection between health outcomes and our material choices. Recent research is helping to prioritize chemicals to be phased out, not through mandates but through our collective refusal to use them.

This is not important “now more than ever;” it is as important as it’s always been. I’ll see you in Philly.

Mike

Thoughts from the Chair: Summer 2024

During a webinar in May, I talked about the progress made over the last decade in our collective ability to know what is in the products we use in our buildings. For most product categories, we have at least some options that have publicly available information about contents and health. Our “right to know” has been fully asserted and should come as no surprise to even mildly engaged manufacturers.

That webinar helped launch the new HPDC Material Health ToolSuite (link), designed to make accessing and understanding this information easier for busy designers, owners, and contractors that must weigh many aspects beyond health with every product selection decision. We no longer have to build with products and materials whose composition and human-health impacts are a complete mystery.

What hasn’t changed much, and likely won’t anytime soon, is the political appetite for regulating even the worst of chemicals. I don’t think we can wait for the political winds to change direction before acting on the information we do now have access to. The tools and certifications in our harmonized ecosystem, and a coalition of willing manufacturers have given us enough to solve most building challenges while also avoiding the human toll that has been part of our industry for far too long.

HPDC will continue the deliberate work of perfecting material health data reporting. Our new tools will constantly improve. Growing numbers of manufacturers will provide more HPDs and certify more projects through programs like Declare, the Living Product Challenge, and Cradle-to-Cradle. We will continue to share data for research helping to prioritize chemicals that need to be better studied and those that need to be replaced with safe alternatives. We will identify new data fields like the recently added manufacture and extraction locator to help address social inequities in the supply chain.

Toxins, child labor, and slavery cannot be any part of sustainable buildings, no matter how entrenched they seem. As we have seen, our collective action has influenced an incredible shift in the knowledge that is available about building products. Now, if we work together to take the next step of choosing materials optimized for human and environmental health, we will see that change accelerate, too. With growing access to high quality and consistently displayed information, we must, and we can, demand better.

Thoughts from the Chair: Spring 2024

Thoughts from the Chair: Spring 2024

Thoughts from the Chair: Spring 2024

During the 1960s and 70s, the interrelationship of humans and our environment was coming into focus. We had churned out enormous quantities of industrial chemicals over the previous half-century and were starting to realize the unintended and ill-considered outcomes of this “progress.” Rachel Carson, who died 60 years ago this year, offered this choice in Silent Spring:

We stand now where two roads diverge. But unlike the roads in Robert Frost’s familiar poem, they are not equally fair. The road we have long been traveling is deceptively easy, a smooth super-highway on which we progress with great speed, but at its end lies disaster. The other fork of the road – the one “less traveled by” – offers our last, our only chance to reach a destination that assures the preservation of our earth.

With her words and the persistence of many other forward thinkers, great progress was made regulating the most blatant pollution – that was easily made obvious to everyone through poor air quality, visible blight, dying animals, birds, and people, and rivers that caught fire. Environmental bills passed Congress with overwhelming, bipartisan majorities during the Kennedy, Johnson, and Nixon administrations (Silent Spring Revolution, Douglas Brinkley).

Pushback soon followed, to the point that today very few chemicals are regulated and the environmental and human health impacts of most are poorly understood. Our air, land, and water may be visibly and sensibly less obviously polluted unless we’re unfortunate enough to live too close to the wrong industrial facility, accident, or extreme weather event; but chemicals known to cause disease, wreak havoc on our biological systems, or degrade our environment remain ubiquitous throughout our lives.

Carson’s superpower was the ability to explain the complex relationships between our chemicals and our health. Her thought above continues:

…we have at last asserted our “right to know,” and if knowing, we have concluded that we are being asked to take senseless and frightening risks, then we should no longer accept the council of those who tell us that we must fill our world with poisonous chemicals; we should look about and see what other course is open to us.

In essence, the HPD is about this “right to know.” We recognize the need to get hazardous chemicals out of our trains, our communities, and our bodies for good. We have spent years collecting data about building products to learn what is safe versus hazardous in the built environment. We continue to develop tools and harmonize an ecosystem of like-minded organizations to better understand the consequences of our product choices throughout their lifecycle. We are dedicated to helping manufacturers, designers, contractors, and owners choose the fork in the road that leads away from harm and towards a healthy, just, and thriving future. Now more than ever before, we have the tools to make this choice accessible to every decision-maker.